Should the Government regulate Computer Games nationally Research Paper

Should the Government regulate Computer Games nationally - Research Paper guinea pigThose in opposition argue that video games argon a youthful form of artistic expressions and are considered to be protected under amendments. Both sides take on based their arguments from scientific works of Craig Anderson, which prove that violent video games increase aggressive behavior and military force (Craig & Karen 20).No causal link established among violent video game exposure and aggressive thinking or behavior. It is unconstitutional to regulate video game content, as there are new form of artistic expressions, which are considered to be protected under amendments with bodies existing to do the rating, like the ESRB. If video games were increasing violent behaviors and aggressiveness, why has juvenile statistics change magnitude steadily since the year 1994? Why does 40% of girls and 90% of boys under the age of 18 play video games and thence no single child has perpetrate crime. Thi s is according to the survey carried out on January 2014.Since 1980s, courts have laid down laws that prohibit children from buying violent video games. US Supreme Court distinct to consider a California law sponsored by Arnold Schwarzenegger banning the sale of violent video games to minors on 27th, June 2011. The law imposes $ 1,000 fines on any stores circumvent it. However, the question is that, is it necessary for the government to regulate what children should play? While regulations by the government are welcomed in some corners of our lives, it is not always welcomed everywhere. Gun violence has been rampant and U.S President Barack Obama is set out to find the causes of such violence. This is according to his Chicago speech on February 10,th of February, 2013 California law banned the sale of the near violent video games involving killing, maiming and sexually assaulting image of human being. Games violating this standard would have to bear an 18+ label. However, the Cou rt ruled that the current rating system was sufficient, and parents are free to deny their